![]() Labe has already shown how landscapes can be achieved with the 1650. You can go to 50mm f/5.6, place the subject near to the middle of the frame for the highest sharpness, then ensure that there are no distracting backgrounds and a significant distance from the lens > subject > background to ensure that you get a decent amount of background blur and separation from the background for portraits. I currently have the kit lens, but I have been noticing that it does not really produce high IQ.Therefore I've been researching for a new lens that match these conditions I do hope one of you can recommend a good lens within my budget, as I would really hate it if all of my photos in this very special occasion cmae out terrible or not really that good, which will not be as good as taking breathtaking photos to keep for a lifetime, if you know what I mean ) ![]() This lens is also excellent according to reviews on YouTube and other online reviews I've seen, but I don't really trust the use of a THIRD PARTY LENS compared with a NATIVE SONY LENS, because it has that assurance, but maybe someone can convince me that it is the exact same quality as a native lens. The question mark is because I don't remember which one I was considering, the f2.8/1.4. SONY Sel35f18- according to the various reviews I've read, this lens is quite good value for money, but it's much farther than my budget. it must not be too expensive, maybe under 200-300 dollars (I'm probably buying it used so yah can go up a bit higher) ![]() it must be a good lens for landscape and maybe portraits as I'm bringing it for my Europe trip this June✈️ P.S Excuse my bad English, it's not my first language I currently have the kit lens, but I have been noticing that it does not really produce high IQ.Therefore I've been researching for a new lens that match these conditions:) Yes, it would've been nice to have built-in variable nd's, but slap a vnd on your glass and you're going to be fine.Hi, I'm starting this thread to ask about lenses for my 1 month old Sony a6000. So, who is this camera ultimately for? For anyone who wants quality that matches high-end cinema cameras. For me, it matches all the things I want in a camera - Image quality, ease of use, and relative affordability. The small form factor is great for run and gun shooters, especially with the top handle with the audio pre-amps. The colors straight out of camera can be matched with their entire cinema line. The auto focus and the stabilization with Sony native glass that also has stabilization is pure butter (for the foreseeable future, my gimbals will be collecting dust). was left wanting a higher quality image, and since I can't afford a Venice, Alexa Mini, or Red, it was a toss up between the Sony A7SIII and the Sony FX3, and eventually ripped the bandaid of anxiety and got the FX3. ![]() I primarily wanted a camera for video and the A7III fit for me, but I. I dug deep into what I wanted out of my first camera and three must haves were: Image quality, ease of use, and affordability. Well, I upgraded from the A7III, which is an incredible camera by itself, it was my first-ever camera, and I can say that I love the user interface, ease of use, and overall, the look of the images from Sony. I've been seeing the question a lot on forums and video reviews, "Who is this camera for?"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |